Why Sustainability Can’t Wait Until Construction

Sustainability isn't new to construction, but the way teams approach it is changing.

In the past, sustainability efforts were often tied to compliance requirements, certifications, or reporting activities. While those remain important, many of the decisions that have the biggest impact on a project's environmental performance happen much earlier, during preconstruction.

That's why forward-thinking firms are bringing sustainability into early planning and evaluating it alongside cost, schedule, and scope. By doing so, they can make more informed decisions while they still have the greatest flexibility to influence project outcomes.

Why sustainability conversations can’t wait until construction starts

Many sustainability outcomes are locked in early on. The decisions you make during design and planning can determine everything from building orientation and material choices to procurement strategies. All of these things influence a project's long-term environmental impact.

As such, teams can no longer afford to wait until after the design stage to tackle sustainability. It needs to be part of the conversation right from the get-go, alongside cost, schedule, and scope.

If you wait until the project’s later stages to make adjustments, you risk:

  • Increasing costs by redesigning completed work or sourcing alternative materials
  • Disrupting schedules as changes ripple through the project
  • Compromising the original design intent to meet sustainability goals

In other words, when teams delay those sustainability conversations and decisions, they’re limiting their options throughout the project, which results in reactive decisions.

What’s changing in preconstruction

The good news is that firms are increasingly recognizing the importance of baking in sustainability from the start. The best preconstruction teams today treat “going green” not as a separate initiative, but as a core precon workflow. 

Because of this, projects are coming together in a much more holistic way. Teams aren't just asking, "Can we afford this?" They're also asking, "What's the long-term impact?"

With that, they’re also evaluating choices around materials, procurement, and design through both a financial and an environmental lens.

So rather than scrambling to solve sustainability challenges later, project teams can weigh their options early, while they still have more options. This results in a more balanced approach that considers performance, cost, and long-term outcomes from the very beginning.

Key areas where sustainability shapes early decisions

The areas in which you apply that sustainability lens matter. When it comes to preconstruction, here are the areas where teams can have the most influence.

Carbon modeling

Embodied carbon—i.e., the total greenhouse gas emissions generated from infrastructure materials—is largely determined before construction even begins. This is why proactive carbon modeling is so valuable. By analyzing the carbon impact of different design concepts and material options upfront, teams can compare scenarios and understand the tradeoffs before specifications are finalized.  

Material selection

Material choices affect far more than cost. They influence everything from availability and durability to embodied carbon and long-term performance. When teams look at these factors together, they can identify options that meet project goals without sacrificing sustainability or blowing the budget.

Procurement strategy

In addition to the materials themselves, where those materials come from and how they’re sourced also impact sustainability.

Evaluating suppliers, lead times, transportation, and sourcing practices gives procurement teams more flexibility to align purchasing decisions with both project schedules and sustainability objectives.

Lifecycle cost considerations

Just because something has a low upfront cost, doesn’t mean it’s the best long-term investment. You need to look beyond initial pricing to really understand how material and design choices affect maintenance, operating costs, and building performance. Having this broader perspective often leads to smarter decisions for both the project and the owner.

Of course, none of these decisions happen in isolation. A change in materials can affect carbon emissions, procurement timelines, lifecycle costs, and the overall budget. As such, teams must look at these factors together to make more informed tradeoffs before they're locked into a path forward.

Why early collaboration drives better sustainability outcomes

No single team owns sustainability. Consider:

  • Designers influence material and system choices - They compare design options early, choosing materials and building systems that balance performance, cost, and environmental impact.
  • Estimators evaluate cost tradeoffs and feasibility - Estimating teams show how sustainability choices affect budgets, helping teams understand what's practical before plans are finalized.
  • Procurement teams assess availability and sourcing constraints - They identify suppliers, lead times, and sourcing risks so sustainable materials don't create unnecessary delays.
  • Owners define priorities and long-term goals - Whether it’s reducing carbon emissions, lowering operating costs, or achieving sustainability certifications, the project vision is set by the owner

Sustainability works best when it's a shared responsibility, not a handoff between teams. Bringing the right people together during preconstruction helps everyone understand the tradeoffsand make decisions that support both project goals and desired sustainability outcomes.

The risk of treating sustainability as a late-stage checkbox

When sustainability is simply bolted into the project, teams have fewer options and much less flexibility.

That could lead to difficult compromises, such as:

  • Higher costs from redesigns or last-minute material substitutions
  • Schedule delays because teams have to revisit plans or source new products
  • Tradeoffs between staying on budget and meeting sustainability goals
  • Missed opportunities to reduce carbon emissions or improve overall building performance

For example, a team may decide late in the project to replace conventional concrete with a lower-carbon alternative. By then, approved specifications, supplier agreements, and pricing may already be in place. The change can increase costs, delay procurement, and force the team to choose between staying on schedule and meeting sustainability goals.

Or let’s say a project team realizes after design is complete that its embodied carbon is higher than expected. Reducing it could require different materials, revised specifications, and new suppliers. All of that can increase costs and push back the schedule.

On the flip side, when you move sustainability upstream, you can avoid many of these last-minute compromises. Teams no longer have to be reactive. Instead, they can evaluate options and build sustainability into the project when they have a lot more choices.

How leading teams approach sustainability differently

Leading teams don't treat sustainability as a separate initiative. They make it part of every major decision from the beginning.

These teams tend to share a few common practices:

  • Evaluate sustainability alongside cost and schedule to understand tradeoffs.
  • Use early-stage analysis to compare design options and guide project direction.
  • Align stakeholders early so designers, estimators, procurement teams, and owners are working toward the same goals.
  • Treat sustainability as an ongoing process by revisiting decisions as the project evolves.
  • Prioritize transparency over perfection, making informed tradeoffs instead of chasing an ideal solution.

Early actions teams can take today

Moving sustainability upstream doesn't require a complete overhaul of your preconstruction process. Small changes early in a project can lead to better decisions and fewer compromises later.

Here are a few practical ways to get started:

  • Bring sustainability into early design discussions so it's considered alongside cost, schedule, and scope from day one.
  • Evaluate material options before specifications are finalized to compare cost, availability, and environmental impact.
  • Ensure procurement strategies are aligned with your sustainability goals by considering suppliers, sourcing, and lead times early.
  • Include lifecycle costs in budgeting conversations, not just upfront material and construction costs.
  • Set clear project priorities so teams can make informed tradeoffs when balancing sustainability, budget, and performance.

The earlier these conversations happen, the more flexibility teams have to make choices that support both project goals and long-term sustainability outcomes.

Why this shift improves more than sustainability

Tackling sustainability early isn’t just about having a more positive environmental impact. When you “go green” from the start, you’re also able to unlock better decisions across the board.

Additionally, when sustainability is considered alongside cost, schedule, and scope, teams get more clarity around tradeoffs before they're forced into expensive changes. That leads to stronger alignment between designers, estimators, procurement teams, and owners.

Projects also benefit from more predictable costs and stronger long-term performance. In the end, bringing sustainability into preconstruction isn't just good for the environment. It’s clearly good for business.

Actionable takeaways

If you’ve read this far, you’re likely ready to take action and want to introduce sustainability practices earlier in the project. With that, here are some key takeaways to keep in mind:

  • Treat sustainability as an input, not an output
  • Bring sustainability conversations forward in preconstruction
  • Align design, estimating, and procurement early
  • Focus on transparency around tradeoffs
  • Make decisions when flexibility is highest

Final words

By the time construction begins, many of the decisions that shape a project's sustainability have already been made. That's why preconstruction is the most important opportunity to influence environmental impact while balancing cost, performance, and project goals. =

With Autodesk Forma for Preconstruction, teams can evaluate sustainability impacts alongside cost and design from the earliest stages of planning, helping them make smarter decisions with greater confidence. Learn more about the Forma for Preconstruction bundle.

Jeff Gerardi

Jeff Gerardi is the general manager of preconstruction technology at Autodesk. In his role at Autodesk, Jeff oversees the vision and strategy of Autodesk’s preconstruction portfolio of products. He is involved in the development, marketing and driving the success of these products. Prior to Autodesk, Jeff founded ProEst Estimating which was acquired by Autodesk in late 2021. Under Jeff’s leadership, ProEst grew into a thriving, cutting edge SAAS technology firm that served thousands of contractors across the globe. Born into a family of business owners, Jeff has long had an entrepreneurial spirit which helped this company’s growth and success. Jeff is based in San Diego with his wife and three children. They are all avid athletes always looking for life’s next adventure.